O.k., admit it. Who has done this (or something that resulted in the same loss of info) before?
>> laster ??? Undefined function or variable 'laster'.
>> lasterr ans = Undefined function or variable 'laster'.
D'Oh! I need a ERRORBEFORELASTERR function.
What's one of your dumb MATLAB mistakes?
No products are associated with this question.
Entering
>> rand(100000)
instead of
>> rand(100000,1)
Hm. Why has my whole machine come to a grinding halt?
Did I ever get bitten by this one today. I had the OS complaining that the startup disk had run out of space for memory (600 GB?!) and telling me to close some applications.
My preferred version of this stumble is something along these lines:
idx = find(M(:)<this_or_that);
N = randn(idx);
instead of
N = randn(size(idx));
Trying to edit a command already visible in the Command Window:
>> x=3
x =
3
Now put the cursor up beside x=3 and try to change it to 4:
>> 4
Oh, right, I should be down here!
Andrew Newell about 2 hours ago
assert(Yup=vote)
Error: The expression to the left of the equals sign is not a valid target for an assignment.
+1 to Preview Window
Overlaying command with variables:
plot=1:10; plot(1:10) ans = 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10
Or command with commands like creating and own contrast.m function and then using MATLAB's CONTRAST function.
All this typicall leads to errors messages that are not helpful to detect the cause and only if you think of WHICH -ALL, you find it
And the number of commands grows all the time - especially if you have been visiting the FEX a lot.
forget to put ; in some vector and array operations and get the command line spammed.
I do that all of the time. But just forgetting the ';' ONCE, isn't the bad part. I use the up arrow a lot and so then I rerun the same command w/out the damn ';'. One lost semicolon can stick around for awhile.
I've been using MATLAB for 15 years or so - I teach people how to use it - and, of course, I stress the important difference between * and .* ...
So guess what once caused me a couple of hours of frustrated debugging of an image reconstruction algorithm...
Physician, heal thyself! (And don't test your algorithm on square images)
clear
Oops, I wanted to keep one of those variables.
I almost never use clear. I downloaded 'keep' on the FEX and it is far better.
That is of course unless I take the "Nuke it from orbit" approach; for which I wrote a script: 'cll.m' >>clear;close all;clc
Along the lines of the cyclist's popular mistake, I do this one often enough:
x = rand(1:100); % I meant: x = rand(1,100); ??? Error using ==> rand Maximum variable size allowed by the program is exceeded.
I do this about twice a year. I would like to blame fat fingers, but the ":" isn't that close to the "," on the keyboard!
When I say orally to my peers to type
rehash toolboxcache
in 99 cases out of 100 they type
rehash toolboxcash
More in keeping with the OP, and another in the "physician heal thyself" category:
[fiddling about at the command line, trying to work out some kinks in an algorithm]
x1 - x2 % looks mostly near zero, but big vector, so: max(ans) % oops, I meant... max(abs(ans)) % no, not *that* ans! ::sigh::
But the Command History window makes it so easy to patch that boo-boo!
As I reenter commands I chide myself "thought you'd save those few keystrokes, didn't you..."
Yeah, I was tought not to use ans by some teacher way back. Using ans simply gets you into trouble.
The case of the misplaced transpose:
v1'*v2
instead of
v1*v2'
especially when these are very long row vectors... and there's no semicolon at the end of that line.
c = {'a', 'b', 'c'}
c(2) = ''
>> c = {'a', 'c')
Ups. I meant C{2} = ''. Another variant:
c = cell(1, 100);
c(:) = ''
>> c = {}
Better: c(:) = {''} to get a cell of empty strings.
The old EVAL bugs, only a little bit more concealed:
Marker = {'lank', 'rank'}; % Ankle markers
Trajectory = rand(100, 3, 2);
MagicAutoAssign(Marker, Trajectory);
plot(rank); % FAIL
% ---------------
function MagicAutoAssign(Marker, Trajectory)
for i = 1:numel(Marker)
assignin('caller', Marker{i}, Trajectory(:, :, i));
end
Now plotting "rank" fails, because Matlab calls the toolbox function RANK instead. But it works, if "rank" is accessed using an index:
plot(1:100, rank(:, 1)); % OK
It was even worse in Matlab < 2008a: Even "RANK" in uppercase letters was forwarded to the function in non-debug mode, but in debug mode the uppercase "RANK" was recognized as variable. So you can create an error, which disappears at debugging - worst case!
Simple conclusion: Never create variables dynamically.
>> exit
instead of
>> edit
Not so much with MATLAB, but with MATLAB answers. This one has bitten me several times.
I will edit an answer I had given earlier, in response to more questions or comments from the OP. Often the edit will be fairly lengthy, and so take some time. When I am done I check for spelling errors (usually) then hit the Submit button - at least that is what I should do. Sometimes I hit the Edit link, which causes the page to refresh! All typing lost ..... Aargh!
It would be nice if there simply was no Edit link available when editing (what is it there for anyway?), for dummies like me!
Sorry Andrew, at least I am not alone ;)
Haha, maybe if I bump this post I can infect more regular posters!
If they too complain, then perhaps TMW will remove the Edit button when editing is enabled...
for i = 1:3 disp(exp(i*pi)); end
Instead of:
for i = 1:3 disp(exp(1i*pi)); end
Rejoice - now you can do it object-oriented style!
>> ME = MException ??? Error using ==> MException Not enough input arguments
>> ME = MException.last
ME =
MException
Properties:
identifier: 'MATLAB:minrhs'
message: 'Not enough input arguments.'
cause: {0x1 cell}
stack: [0x1 struct]
Methods
Even with this, you can make the same mistake:
>> MException.lst
??? No appropriate method, property, or field lst for class MException.
>> MException.last
ans =
MException
Properties:
identifier: 'MATLAB:noSuchMethodOrField'
message: 'No appropriate method, property, or field lst for class MException.'
cause: {}
stack: [0x1 struct]
Methods
While in the debugger, typing quit instead of dbquit kills Matlab!
(My earlier version of this answer may have been too cryptic.)
Working:
n = datenum(datestr(now, 29), 29)
Failing (Matlab 2009a):
n = datenum(datestr(now, 30), 30) >> Failed to lookup month of year.
DATENUM(S, F) needs a string as format specifier F. If F is numerical, it is interpreted as pivot year. With F=29 DATENUM works on accident only.
I've tried to start an instance of another Matlab version, but the current directory was a toolbox folder by accident:
In Matlab 6.5, Windows:
cd(fullfile(matlabroot, 'toolbox\matlab\strfun');
system('C:\Programme\Matlab\R2009a\bin\win32\MATLAB.exe &')
==> Matlab 2009a starts with a lot of warnings about finding M-files, which are builtin functions. Then the script STRNCMP (the help text only!) is attempted to execute as a function. Because this fails, the Matlab path contains just \toolbox\local. Without toolbox function the diagnosis was tedious.
I had a similar break down, after overloading STRCMP with a damaged version.
I'm glad to hear that. It is a mess and a silly waste of time. Another version of such faults:
M-script with the help text only in one folder:
\MFiles\Folder\MyFun.m
Compiled function for different platforms in specific folders, which are included in the path dynamically:
\MFiles\ForMatlab6\MyFun.dll
\MFiles\ForMatlab7\MyFun.mexw32
Now calling MyFun from the command line or another M-function fails, if \MFiles\Folder\ is the current folder: "Attempt to call the script MyFun as a function". Solution: CD to a neutral folder.
I wanted to add the optimization flag /arch:SSE2 in my MEX call in Matlab 2009a:
mex -O OPTIMFLAGS="$OPTIMFLAGS /arch:SSE2" func.c
For a batch processing I need the functional form (or EVAL?!):
mex('-O', 'OPTIMFLAGS="$OPTIMFLAGS /arch:SSE2"', 'func.c')
>> ERROR: flag /arch:SSE2 is not recognized.
Ugly parser! The over-complicated BAT-> M-> PERL-> Compiler pipeline of the MEX command tries to be intelligent. This works:
mex('-O', 'OPTIMFLAGS="$OPTIMFLAGS', '/arch:SSE2"', 'func.c')
The string must be split inside the double quoted section, although these double quotes are used to avoid the splitting!
Check if a path name contains a certain folder name anywhere
if any(findstr(PathName, '/Sub/')) ...
Because FINDSTR searches the shorter string in the longer one, the condition is true for the path name '/' also.
Modern Matlab version use STRFIND(String, Pattern) and afaik FINDSTR will be deprecated. But the program containing the example was developped under Matlab 5.3. Fixing the bug by changing FINDSTR to STRFIND is not trivial, if the strings are created dynamically, e.g. FINDSTR(a{i}, ['@', b{j}]).
At least in Matlab 2009a the toolbox functions contains a lot of these pitfalls, e.g. Signal\PMEM: "if ~isempty(findstr(flag, 'CORR')), ...", which triggers for 'OR' also.
Moving into the Figure window, but in a similar spirit to the rand(100000) thing, I use this when I need an excuse to take a break...
data = randn(2, 1e6); plot(data)
when I meant this...
plot(data')
Sometimes I make a typo in structure field name, for example:
my_struct.field1 = 1
and then:
my_struct.filed1 = 2
It produces:
my_struct =
field1: 1
filed1: 2instead of:
my_struct =
field1: 2
Too bad we cannot "lock down" structures to prevent new fields from being added.
@Walter: We can. I'm using a selftest function, which scans the source code and checks all symbols, which contain a dot. The structs are created in a dedicted function, and no other function is allowed to add further fields.
I care for a minimal edit-distance, e.g. I avoid S.mvc and S.mcv, which would be too susceptible for typos. Of course I never create fields by complicated EVAL commands or LOAD structs directly to the workspace.
Using OO methods would be a more convenient method to limit the definition of fields. But even for functional programs, OO strategies are important for writing reliable software.
The process-first-non-singelton feature can be smarter than the user:
m = randi(4); n = randi(4); M = rand(m, n); ColumnSum = sum(M); % DANGEROUS
If m is 1, the sum is calulated alog the 2nd dimension. Better:
ColumnSum = sum(M, 1); % Secure
NOTE: For min, max and std the 2nd input is not the dimension!
max([1, 2; 3, 4], 2) % >> [2, 2; 3, 4], elementwise maximun max([1, 2; 3, 4], [], 2) % >> [2; 4], maximun along 2nd dimension
The squeeze() command has similar dangers, when there are unanticipated singleton dimensions. In my experience, it is almost always possible, and wiser, to use permute() rather than squeeze().
have anyone tried typing "Why" in the command prompt? MATLAB gives funny responses..just carry on typing for fun.. :)
I've listed some other Easter Eggs in http://www.mathworks.com/matlabcentral/answers/2001-what-matlab-easter-eggs-do-you-know
Although I never use clear all (see Answers: Bad CLEAR ALL), it appears in user-supplied code frequently. If all is defined as a variable, the behaviour might be unexpected:
clear all b = 1; all = 2; clear all whos % Name Size Bytes Class Attributes % b 1x1 8 double
If "all" is a variable, it is cleared, but the other variables are not touched.
[EDITED] The "clear all" behaviour is a typical example for the bad programming practize of using magic numbers. Here the string 'all' is magic, because it triggers a totally amnesia, if there is no variable of this name. It would be smarter to use invalid symbols for special commands, e.g. "$all". See Wiki: magic numbers and Wiki: magic strings.
@Walter: The magic strings let us make mistakes, when we forget to consider them. E.g. I forgot the escape character in a context menu, where I can move an object to its "default" position. It is in the nature of context menus, that an automatic unit-test cannot find this bug, but only an active user.
I'm sure most programmers omit a test for {'default', 'remove', 'factory'}, when they assign the string of buttons or menus dynamically.
To be honest I think a lot of the functions that were created in early MATLAB versions are the ones that tend to have syntax issues like this... Since they've been around so long it would be hard for TMW to break backwards compatibility. As TMW hired more professional programmers over the years, instead of mathematicians/scientists doubling as programmers, things have improved IMHO, like your example about '-regexp'. Of course this is all personal opinion YMMV etc, and it's not intended to be a slight at all to TMW old-timers :)
P.S. I've also recently requested that TMW consider making the use of 'clear all' an M-lint/Analyzer warning, because it has side effects that trip people up (like clearing breakpoints & globals, flushing the M-file cache, etc). If you like the idea, call/email support and lend your vote to this enhancement request! :)
The strings 'default', 'remove', and 'factory' are not allowed as uimenu labels, see Ref: uimenu_props. To get the string 'default' as label, '\default' must be used.
This is another example for the bad magic strings. Imagine you want to create a bunch of uimenu s automatically using a list of words. Then the exception handling for these three words will be ugly and increase the program size without a real benefit.
[EDITED] The named strings have a special meaning for other handle graphics objects also, e.g. UICONTROLs:
uicontrol('String', 'default')
This doe not display 'default' in a button, but an empty string, because this is the default value:
get(0, 'defaultUIControlString')
To display 'default', 'factory', or 'remove', a leading backslash is required, see doc: setting-default-property-values:
uicontrol('String', '\default')
It would be smarter to use the backslash for the special commands, but this cannot be changed without breaking the backward compatibility.
What is required to display the string '\default' in an UICONTROL???
Corrupting years of experience in other languages...
After using MatLab for several months now, I find that when I go back to writing C code I catch myself forgetting to put parentheses on my if statements and using single-quotes for my strings.
And MATLAB with lower-case a, t, a, b. Can anybody explain, why MATLAB is written with an upper-case L frequently? I did this myself also. Has it been the official spelling in Matlab 4?
See Stevens confusion of ~= and != above.
>> close al Error using close (line 111) Specified window does not exist.
Dammit!
5 Comments
Direct link to this comment:
http://www.mathworks.nl/matlabcentral/answers/1759#comment_3342
Maybe we need an enhancement request for:
set(0,'IAmAnIdiot',true)
That would go in my startup.m
Direct link to this comment:
http://www.mathworks.nl/matlabcentral/answers/1759#comment_3381
But what if I type by mistake:
set(0, 'IAmAnIdoit', true)
Direct link to this comment:
http://www.mathworks.nl/matlabcentral/answers/1759#comment_3426
Clicking on the above link might get you "page not found". If so, remove the trailing > from the URL.
Direct link to this comment:
http://www.mathworks.nl/matlabcentral/answers/1759#comment_3499
My apologies to everyone while I learn how to edit comments. Here is my third try:
This is like David Lodge's "Humiliation Game" (http://www.guardian.co.uk/books/2008/jun/13/david.lodge), except that admitting we're dumb doesn't cost us a job (unless we work for Matlab?) and everyone believes us.
Direct link to this comment:
http://www.mathworks.nl/matlabcentral/answers/1759#comment_3876
Best answer was a toss-up between the top two vote getters.